Former FBI agent and MSNBC "national security analyst" Frank Figliuzzi said Monday that FOX News host Tucker Carlson and Republican members of Congress like Lauren Boebert should face "civil consequences" for allegedly inspiring the mass shooting at a Colorado Spring gay bar this weekend. "If [the Colorado Springs shooter] is a consumer of the people we just rattled off, from Lauren Boebert to Tucker Carlson, let's get it out at trial, let's expose it for what it is, name it and shame it. He's a consumer of these people and those people should face civil consequences from the victims," Figliuzzi said. <blockquote>FRANK FIGLIUZZI: This toxic mix of hatred, plus clinging to assault weapons, is the laziest way to target your opponent. Targeting what you don't like is the laziest way out, and seemingly, they think, the easiest way to just make what you don't like go away. But the Senator's got this right. It is it about instilling fear. And the correct response for the rest of us is to step up and push back, right at them. So it's hatred, it's clinging to weapons, it's ignorance of the other, demonizing the other. We said this over and over again. But strategically, what appears to be happening is they want to deny people the safe haven and safe harbor, whether we're talking about kids in school feeling unsafe because of guns, Black churches like they're going to get shot up at a bible study that's happened in South Carolina. Whether it's synagogues, whether it's the gay club on a weekend night, there seems to be a concerted effort to not only instill fear but deny the safe places. And that puts them in control. And then, the theory is if you're fearful enough, you're not going to push back. But what we need to see happening is the exact opposite. We need to see accountability and consequences. First, a real quick hate crime charge here on top of the homicide charges, I applaud that, that tells me prosecutors and police, they found quickly what they needed. That means they know this was a bias crime. This is likely, since we've heard reports that the subject isn't cooperative with police, that means they likely found clearly and convincing evidence on his devices. If he's a consumer, of the people we just rattled off from Lauren Boebert to Tucker Carlson, let's get it out. Let's get it out at trial, let's expose it for what it is, name it and shame it. He's a consumer of these people and those people should face civil consequences from the victims. The other thing they want to deny is not only the safe harbor, but the way we resolve this. By that, I mean, you asked earlier, how do we put a stop to hate? One of the things you would normally do is teach young children in school, here's what race is about. Here's what these other people over here, who may seem different to you, they have a different orientation. But increasingly, states are saying, no, no, no, you can't talk about race, say the word "Gay" or teach anything in school. </blockquote>