Bevan: Democrats Moved From 'Collusion' To 'Obstruction' To 'Emoluments' Accusations; Only Want Trump Out

RCP co-founder and publisher Tom Bevan joins Bret Baier and FNC's 'Special Report' panel to explain why today's <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/06/13/watch_live_ag_jeff_sessions_testifies_on_contacts_with_russians_in_2016.html">Senate testimony from Attorney General Jeff Sessions</a> is not going to be the end of the attempts to implicate the Trump administration for doing something (anything) illegal. <blockquote>BRET BAIER: Is there a chance that Capitol Hill moves on [from the Russia investigation]? When does the onus shift? I've asked this a couple times to different panels and different people... Does it ever shift to there being a <i>there, there</i>? Otherwise we all need to move on. TOM BEVAN: I don't think so. BAIER: [Special investigator] Bob Mueller? BEVAN: Well look, theoretically in a perfect world, Bob Mueller will come out with a decision that... moves forward the investigation. And that would be sort of the decisive moment. But I do think we have seen the Democrats... because the base of their party... do not believe that Trump is the legitimate president, and they want to see him removed by any means necessary. So there was initially <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/stream/?topic=russia_collusion">collusion</a>, then we are moving to <a href="https://www.realclearpolitics.com/stream/?topic=obstruction_of_justice">obstruction</a>, and now <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/06/12/watch_live_dc_and_maryland_attorneys_general_press_conference_on_suing_trump.html">we're moving to Democratic Attorneys General of states suing on the emoluments clause</a>, next they are going to go after his business dealings. So even if Bob Mueller comes out with a decisive opinion one way or the other, this is going to carry on. </BLOCKQUOTE>